Yes, I am. Photodo seem to think so. Nothing's ever the same after 5-10 years. Things change, right - glas, polishing, coating, the people involved, competion, prices etc., etc. So how good is the M-1.4/50 1.4. There are loads of those at eekybay at the moment, very few FA's, a few Takumar/Super Takumar and ZERO K-1.4/50mm and ZERO F-1.4/50mm
BTW, I jsut posted a FA 1.4/500 shot, comparable to the shots I made with the 3 Limited's: http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/176951745/ Cheers Jens Bladt http://www.jensbladt.dk +45 56 63 77 11 +45 23 43 85 77 Skype: jensbladt248 -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Shel Belinkoff Sendt: 28. juni 2006 12:58 Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Emne: RE: FA-50/1.4 (used) price Are you suggesting that the F50/1.4 is superior to the A and the FA versions of the lens? According to Boz's site, all three are the same optically. Shel > [Original Message] > From: Jens Bladt > http://tinyurl.com/gm67u > > The F-version is supposed to be even better - one of the very best 50mm > ever. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.5/377 - Release Date: 06/27/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.5/377 - Release Date: 06/27/2006 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
