Well, of course I'm saying something with a photograph. Sometimes I communicate better or more effectively that way than in other ways - that's the whole point, right?
What irks me, is someone asking me what I'm trying to say. It's in the photograph. That's what the photograph is for: to communicate something that's otherwise difficult to simply communicate in few words - if at all. So chances are if someone asks me what I'm trying to say, I honestly can't answer them. cheers, frank On 6/29/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In a message dated 6/28/2006 9:24:12 AM Pacific Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Bingo! > > Very well put. > > Kenneth Waller > > ========= > Ditto. Agree with the above and the below. > > Marnie aka Doe > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "DagT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: What Were You Trying to Say? > > > > Of course you are saying something. You show your personal selection > > of the world that passes by. You may not be able to put it into > > words, but the message is there. This is what I choose to show you, > > this is what I think is worth showing. > > > > DagT > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
