You can still contribute to PUG by commenting the pictures. Jostein
On 7/4/06, Lon Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It seems to me that the recent spate of messages about PUG resulted in a > healthy number of photos. > Maybe we should all gripe a bit a week before the due date. Sorry I > didn't contribute this month. > > Tom C wrote: > > > Hi Adelheid, > > Respectfully, none of the comments on that topic was ever intended to > > make you a subject of the discussion and I was extremely careful to > > avoid that. I'm sorry you are feeling frustrated. > > I think the conversation was healthy overall - not futile bickering. > > It may lead to more participation and to higher quality submissions. > > I'm sure all who have participated in the past or will in the future, > > appreciate your efforts. > > > >> From: "AvK" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > >> To: "Pentax Discuss" <[email protected]> > >> Subject: PUG again > >> Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 17:54:15 +0200 > >> > >> Hi folks, > >> you know that i am very quiet on this list, because i simply don't > >> have the time to post. > >> I hack out every month the time from my busy schedule to make the PUG. > >> Ok i have automated it quite a bit and i am willing to do it for some > >> time to come. If the ones who have the time to bicker about the PUG > >> would spend this time to contribute it would be better spent time in > >> my humble opinion. > >> I am bit frustrated, so don't take this comment as a reason for a new > >> round of bickering. > >> Best > >> Adelheid > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
