Since it's a fisheye, one would expect that. No? On Jul 8, 2006, at 7:01 PM, William Robb wrote:
> > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jack Davis" > Subject: 10-17mm Review > > >> FYI, Aug issue of Pop Photo has very positive review of the Pentax >> 10~17mm f/3.5-4.5 DA fisheye zoom written by Herbert Kepler. >> As might be expected, older 17~28mm f/3.5-4.5 F fisheye, also, >> approvingly referenced for comparison. > > > Just proves old Herb is going blind. My 10-17 has really bad barrel > distortion. > > William Robb > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
