I think you ar right, Bob. The fill light was mostly a reflector screen, not properly set. I did the lighting myself for the shots where she's sitting "the wrong way" on a chair, myslef, though. She is semi professional model - a member of an amateur bureau. Regards Jens Bladt http://www.jensbladt.dk +45 56 63 77 11 +45 23 43 85 77 Skype: jensbladt248
-----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Bob Shell Sendt: 12. juli 2006 12:49 Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Emne: Re: Model Night in the Camera Club On Jul 11, 2006, at 8:39 PM, Jens Bladt wrote: > I'm not really satisfied with the sharpness - I guess I must try to > use MF > next time :-) > BTW - they're all shot with Limited 77mm and FA 1.4 50mm. > Take a look: > http://www.jensbladt.dk/Modelnight/Pernille-site.html > Any critics or advice is welcome, naturally ... For a glamour portrait, which I suppose is what you are after, the lighting ratio is usually set to be "short". That is less difference between main light and fill light. The lighting ratio on these is all wrong. Not enough fill. This kind of lighting is more appropriate to an older male model, not the girl you were photographing. She is a professional model? She needs to relax her face more, since her smile looks very strained in some of these, very artificial. Bob -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.10/385 - Release Date: 07/11/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.10/385 - Release Date: 07/11/2006 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
