Ironically, the 20D has absoluetly no issues with mounting M42 lenses 
via an adaptor, just like Pentax. Nikon F mount is also quite doable, 
along with Leica R, Contax/Yashica and OM mount. Of the major mounts 
only FD, MD and Minolta AF cannot be adapted with a plain adaptor (K 
mount can be adapted with a plain adaptor to EF-S, and if the aperture 
lever is trimmed, to all EF via a very new adaptor or Cotty's mount 
replacement procedure).

I've personally used M42 and F mount lenses on EF when I had my EOS 3.

-Adam



Lucas Rijnders wrote:
> Op Fri, 14 Jul 2006 11:18:21 +0200 schreef Christian  
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 
> 
>>Lucas Rijnders wrote:
> 
> 
>>>No: Canon Fd register is shorter than EOS, so with an adapter you either
>>>loose infinity focus, or you need an optical adapter: essentially a weak
>>>TC. That is different, and arguably inferior, to M42-to-K...
> 
> 
>>The original statement was that it was not "possible to mount a FD lens
>>on an EOS body." based on one attempt at a camera club without the
>>required adapter. Regardless of tradeoffs (optical adapter) it IS
>>"possible."  Different and inferior is for another debate which I will
>>not involve myself in.
> 
> 
> If you allow for optical adapters, you can mount everything on everything,  
> so the discussion becomes meaningless...
> 
> You were supporting the 20D owners who said 'our 20D can do that too',  
> while practically it can't. I know a fine art photographer who still has a  
> dual Fd/EOS setup: Fd with his old quality lenses for serious work, EOS  
> with AF zooms for 'snaps'. If there were a practical way to use his Fd  
> lenses on EOS, he'd use it, I think... On the other hand, with a Pentax  
> you spend $15,- and you're in business, and this is widely done...
> 
> 
>>>You can mount almost everything on EOS, due to the short register and
>>>lerge diameter, but not K-mount, unless you castrate the lens. Ask Cotty
>>>:o)
>>
>>He has been pretty successful, so it is possible.  The fact that there
>>are adapters commercially available for it (with or without taking a
>>hacksaw to the lens) means it is "possible."  Useful or practical is
>>another question. :-)
> 
> 
> Quite relevant, as the young member was considing purchasing, and probably  
> actually using, a camera (brand)...
> 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to