And apparently for many if not most, a "fix" isn't needed here. I looked at this several different ways. I like the DOF treatment as shot. This is the way two objects a few feet apart are seen by a long lens. Whether the near flower is at top or bottom of frame is irrelevant for the most part. Paul On Jul 16, 2006, at 12:32 PM, Doug Brewer wrote:
> The short answer would be: It depends. > > There are so many choices and compromises in any image that one set > solution does not fit all. > > I guess the fix would be to try the shot with different framing/DOF/ > etc and then choose the one you like best in the editing stage. > > Doug > > On Jul 15, 2006, at 4:28 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote: > >> Doug, >> Do you think the fix here would be to put the top flower in sharp >> focus? >> I'll have to try that. >> Regards, Bob S. >> >> On 7/15/06, Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> On Jul 14, 2006, at 4:07 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>>>>> A lithsome pair in their tutus: >>>>>> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4681755 >>> >>> I think what might be troubling some is that the oof bloom >>> appears to >>> be dominant in the frame, because it's higher than the other. I have >>> a couple of similar photos (I'l see if I can dig them up when I get >>> back to work on Monday) and I've pretty much written them off as >>> being upside down, compositionally. >>> >>> I do like your colors, though. Cone flowers are cool. >>> >>> Doug > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
