BMP's are large and typically do not portray photographs well as they are usually 256 colours/shades of grey only.
-Adam Jack Davis wrote: > Yeah? I uploaded this image as in the past. > Are you saying that BMP is inconvenient or unfriendly to access and > view? Tell me if and why I should be concerned. > Just trying to learn. > > Jack > > --- Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/B/BMP.html >> >>Shel >> >> >> >> >>>[Original Message] >>>From: Jack Davis >> >>>You're right about there being no detail in the "dark areas". >>>What's a BMP file? Scanned (wimp flatbed) as a jpg. >>>Contrast was upped slightly to add depth and encourage a denser >> >>black. >> >>>Thus the desired "dark areas". >>> >>>Thanks, Shel >>> >>>--- Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>It looks awful! No detail in the dark areas, the overall tone is >>>>flat and >>>>lifeless. It's posted as a BMP file. Was that your intent? >>>> >>>>Shel >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>[Original Message] >>>>>From: Jack Davis > >>>> >>>>>Marnie's barn (with it's front in shadow) reminded me of this. >>>>>Mamiya 6 w/50mm f/4.1L. >>>>>Location: Yuba County, Northern California. >>>>>http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=132 >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> >>-- >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>[email protected] >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
