Shel wrote: > Well, Frank, apparently, according to some people, if the intent or meaning > isn't spelled out for them, it is a "bad thing."
If I was to answer this your way, Shel, I would also begin with "Well, Frank, ...". But I have no shame of discussing photography with people I do not agree with, or whose lines of thought I do not understand. With regards to having intent or meaning spelled out, there are photos in this world that can stand alone without any words accompanying them, and still convey meaning and intent across cultural, ethnic, political, or any other psychological barrier. You have, on occasion, shown good examples of that yourself. The shot in question is not among them. What it may mean to people with anglo-american background escapes me, I'm sorry. I'm genuinely surprised that a man of your abilities needs a definition of "context" spelled out for him. Jostein -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
