On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 10:36:45AM +0100, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote: > On Wed, 19 Jul 2006, David Savage wrote: > > > At 02:59 PM 19/07/2006, Sylwek wrote: > >> On 18.07.2006, at 21:33 , Mark Roberts wrote: > >> > >>> My other Limiteds (43, 31, 77) are all f/1.9 or faster. That's a lot > >>> more than a third of a stop! F/2.0 and under is Limited territory for > >>> me. I'd *consider* the upcoming 70/2.4 if it were under $500 (and if > >>> I didn't already have the 77!) > >> Yes, but but don't forget DA Limiteds are much cheaper than their > >> faster, FF counterparts. FA 31/1.8 is about two times as expensive as > >> having similar FOV 21/3.2, not to speak that DA is much smaller, > >> lighter and takes 49 mm filters instead of 58 mm... > > > > They're cheaper because they're slower. > > They also cover a smaller image-circle.
I'd be surprised if the DA 70 didn't cover a 35mm frame. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
