Op Thu, 20 Jul 2006 09:52:08 +0200 schreef Jaume Lahuerta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> But...is it possible to correct perspecive without > distorting other parts of the picture? Actually, the perspective is correct in the original picture, I think? The low point-of view results in a vanishing point for the vertical lines, nothing to do about it... > I always get the same effect as Brian, I correct the > perspective (with the Photoshop feature) but the > building doors are squashed vertically. > > Is there another way to do it? You could stretch it vertically afterwards. I think you have to eyeball it, which might be hard... Leaving in some convergence on the verticals tends to result in a more natuaral-looking picture in my experience as well. > --- John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > >> >> It looks as though you've squashed it a little >> vertically >> in the process of correcting the perspective. >> >> On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 12:38:11AM -0500, Brian >> Walters wrote: >> > Hi all >> > >> > I quite liked this photo of afternoon light on the >> sandstone walls of >> > an old church in western Sydney. Unfortunately it >> suffered from >> > converging verticals so I had a go at correcting >> the perspective. >> > >> > It looks OK but perhaps it could have been done >> better. >> > >> > The adjusted image is at the top of the following >> link page and the >> > original image is at the bottom: >> > >> > >> > http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/PAW/thomas-paw.html >> > >> > >> > >> > Comments and suggestions welcome. Technical >> details available by >> > clicking the "i" icon. -- Regards, Lucas -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
