Well said. 

Jack

--- Don Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Forget the academic freedom bit. That's a red herring. He can think
> and 
> say what he likes and teach it as well. I remember (vividly) a 
> University Professor and Head of the Chemistry Department (Cape Town)
> 
> who was crazy. The Vice Chancellor let him go on, and on, and in the
> end 
> he holed up in his office with a .22 rifle and it became a nightmare.
> 
> That's Academic Freedom in action. But it was an exception.
> 
> It's this man's nutty idea that needs to be examined. Is it true? Is
> the 
> report factual or distorted? Newspapers are well known for getting 
> things right out of context. If this is not the case he's digging his
> 
> own grave. If he really believes that those buildings were
> deliberately 
> blown up by the US government, then he's crazy and not fit to teach
> anyway.
> 
> Don
> 
> frank theriault wrote:
> > On 7/25/06, Bob Shell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >   
> >> Which part do you consider bullshit?  What the man proposes to
> teach,
> >> or the university defending his right to teach it?  Personally, I
> >> think freedom of speech must encompass ideas that the mainstream
> >> considers repugnant.
> >>     
> >
> > Right you are, Bob!
> >
> > For one thing, at university, they call them "professors" for a
> > reason.  To profess is merely to affirm a belief.  At a
> post-secondary
> > level, the assumption is that students are at a level that they can
> > research the professors affirmations and form their own opinions as
> to
> > whether the professor is right or wrong.
> >
> > Up to the end of high school we have "teachers".  To teach is to
> > impart knowledge.  The distinction between teachers and professors
> is
> > an important one.
> >
> > This guy in Wisconson may (or may not be) a nutbar, but I defend
> his
> > right to lecture whatever he wants.  Moreso, I defend his
> university's
> > right to pay him and have him lecture there.  The fact that tax
> > dollars go to that university does not give the taxpayers or the
> > legislature the right to demand that the guy gets sacked.  At most,
> it
> > gives them the right to pull those tax dollars out of the place,
> but
> > then 90% or more of the students will be harmed due to (what's
> > portrayed as) the rantings of this loonie.
> >
> > The other thing, of course, is that perhaps, just perhaps, if
> someone
> > actually sat in on this guy's course and read the materials, he
> might
> > have a few accurate things to say, and he might have evidence to
> back
> > up his assertions.  Stranger things have happened.  It's hard to
> judge
> > based on a newspaper article - and a biased one, at that.
> >
> > I've got to admit, I always wondered how it is that the Pentagon
> isn't
> > one of the best defended buildings in the world, with all the
> latest
> > detection devices and radar and defences.  I've always thought it a
> > bit strange that something as complex and difficult to pilot as a
> > modern airliner, flown by a rank amateur, managed to get through
> those
> > defences and score a direct hit.  I'm not saying this guy's right,
> but
> > it makes one wonder.
> >
> > cheers,
> > frank
> >
> >
> >   
> 
> 
> -- 
> Dr E D F Williams
> www.kolumbus.fi/mimosa/
> http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams/
> 41660 TOIVAKKA – Finland - +358400706616
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to