I agree totally. I don't know everything and can learn something practically everywhere I turn. :-)
But relating this back to where it all started... a lunatic professor in Wisconsin who is being paid to (according to some his own peers) 'spout rubbish'... what does it gain one to give ear to his nonsense? Wastes time, wastes money and contributes to his notoriety. Tom C. >From: "Aaron Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: Talk about crap >Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 16:36:00 -0400 > >Tom, if there's nothing you can learn from debunking fake moon landing >claims, you know all about the atmosphere or lack thereof on the moon and >how light behaves in it, to name merely one thing. > >I'm not saying that you have to believe the claims, I'm saying that there >is a lot to be learned in the discussion that's tangental. > >-Aaron > >-----Original Message----- > >From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subj: Re: Talk about crap >Date: Tue Jul 25, 2006 4:09 pm >Size: 1K >To: [email protected] > >The thing is the moon landing fraud claims are so ludicrous as to be >laughable. No need to debunk each claim one by one. > >The entire Apollo project was so demonstrably big, over a number of years, >employing 1000's, if not tens of 1000's of people, not to mention those >overseas connected with the project and the landings themselves that were >not part of NASA or the US government. How would it be possible to >maintain >a conspiracy that large? The consciences of hundreds of whistleblowers >would have prompted them to scream and shout. > >If the moon landig was myth, then what about the prior and subsequent space >programs including the shuttle, mars, voyager, etc.? > >The fact that the Lunar Laser Ranging Experiment equipment set up on the >moon by Apollo 11 astronauts is still being used today by independent >universities, provides ample proof. > >Not to mention that the USSR never doubted it as a fact. > >Tom C. > > > > > >From: Bob Shell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > >Subject: Re: Talk about crap > >Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 14:46:06 -0400 > > > > > >On Jul 25, 2006, at 9:06 AM, Aaron Reynolds wrote: > > > > > I've read some interesting and compelling arguments for the fakery of > > > the moon photographs, but I've read even more interesting and > > > compelling debunkings of those arguments. > > > >Same here. > > > > > > > > That's part of why it's so important to let people talk about this > > > stuff -- you get specifics that you can examine and attempt to > > > counter. > > > >Right. Let the nuts speak. Otherwise you may never know what they > >might say. > > > >Bob > > > >-- > >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >[email protected] > >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >[email protected] >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >[email protected] >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
