On Tue, 21 Aug 2001 14:13:34 -0500, Paris, Leonard wrote: > I thought farthings were a monetary unit. Are you sure you don't mean > "furlong"? > Furlongs per fortnight would be a measure of speed. In my first high school physics class they made us do a ton of unit conversions ... one of my favorites was the speed of light in furlongs per fortnight (about 3 x 10^10 furlongs per fortnight). TTYL, DougF - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
- Re: Asahi vs Honeywell, now OT. Peter Alling
- Re: Asahi vs Honeywell, now OT. Stephen Moore
- Re: Asahi vs Honeywell, now OT. admin
- Re: Asahi vs Honeywell, now OT. Ralf Stubner
- Re: Asahi vs Honeywell, now OT. admin
- Re: Asahi vs Honeywell, now OT. Peter Alling
- Re[2]: Asahi vs Honeywell, now OT. Bob Walkden
- Re: Asahi vs Honeywell, now OT. Bob Blakely
- RE: Asahi vs Honeywell, now OT. Paris, Leonard
- Re: Asahi vs Honeywell, now OT. Bob Blakely
- Re: Asahi vs Honeywell, now OT. Doug Franklin
- Re: Asahi vs Honeywell, now OT. Robert Harris
- RE: Asahi vs Honeywell, now OT. Richard Klein
- RE: Asahi vs Honeywell, now OT. Peter Alling
- RE: Asahi vs Honeywell, now OT. John Coyle
- Re: Asahi vs Honeywell, now OT. Mark Roberts
- RE: Asahi vs Honeywell, now OT. Peter Alling
- Re: Asahi vs Honeywell, now OT. Bob Blakely
- RE: Asahi vs Honeywell, now OT. Joseph Tainter

