Well, if it's rear AS lens element hasn't begun to separate, its sharp,
with good contrast, to my eye flair free, very light weight and
extremely convenient. Damn, I miss mine. On digital it would make a
very nice true normal to short tele, (maybe a bit slow for a real
portrait lens, but it has fairly good "macro" capabilities. It also
auto focuses very quickly and quietly compared to others I've heard
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
>So I hear that a lot of people like this lens, other than its tendency to
>split apart.
>
>I've never been one for zooms, and so I never considered buying it. However,
>I've come across one. Someone convince me to keep it, or not keep it. I'm
>unlikely to ever use it on film (because it won't fit on my 67). I have an
>SMC-M 28mm f2.8, a Super Takumar 35mm f2.0 and an SMC-F 50mm f1.4 in the range
>this fellow covers.
>
>Tell me why I'd want to keep it.
>
>-Aaron
>
>
>
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
