I don't think I use the RSP fill in too often, and I think I've never used it for faces. However, when it's useful it's so much useful! IMHO, this is a nice use for RSP fill in: http://www.dariobonazza.com/provv/12981.jpg
Dario ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Øsleby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 9:20 PM Subject: RE: Lightroom >I haven't used the Windows beta much. At my system it is far to slow. After > every tiny adjustment I have to wait a few seconds to see the effect. But > judging from my little experience it has no control similar to the fill in > RSE/P. > > I've been using RSE/P for about a year now. And I'm pretty happy with it. > But I think I might be ready to move on soon. One of the things I was > hoping > for in the next version of Rawshooter was to be able to meta tag images > before converting them. So, for me, the take over from Adobe was not bad > news. (My RSP license will allow me to download a free finalised version > of > Lightroom) > > At first I enjoyed the effect of the fill. At first glance it makes the > images pop. But after using it for some time I realised it has it side > effects. So now I only use a tiny bit of fill. I have been thinking a lot > about what the control really does. And my conclusion is a analogy to the > audio world. It is kind of similar to a midrange control in an audio > system. > To boost the midrange in a sound system often makes it easier to hear what > a > man says, but it also makes the sound a bit tiring, like a voice from an > bad > telephone system. > > To translate the analogy to photo: The fill makes faces pop in frame, but > it > also creates some very strange skin tones, if overused. > > Now I'm trying to make the images pop without or with very little fill. > This > makes the converting a harder, but I think the results are better. > > What am I trying to say? Perhaps that if Lightroom lives up to my > expectations, I think I can manage without the fill control in RSE/P. I > even > think I might live happily without it. > > > Tim > Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) > > Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds > (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy) > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >> Dario Bonazza >> Sent: 28. juli 2006 18:13 >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> Subject: Re: Lightroom >> >> Rawshooter features the fill-in function. As far as I understand, that >> feature means that low-light areas are developed with a higher >> sensitivity >> than highlights, thus expanding exposure latitude. >> >> Dario >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> >> Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 4:48 PM >> Subject: Re: Lightroom >> >> >> > >> > On Jul 28, 2006, at 6:00 AM, Dario Bonazza wrote: >> > >> >> 1 - Does Lightroom allow to develop files with a compensation for low >> >> lights? In other words, can it differentiate sensitivity among high >> >> and low >> >> lights? >> > >> > I'm not sure what you mean by this. >> > >> >> 2 - Can it do batch conversion? >> > >> > Yes. >> > >> > Godfrey >> > >> > >> > -- >> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> > [email protected] >> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
