Amazing. I'm astounded that any Swiss patent clerk could possibly be good at physics. Who'd have thought such a thing was possible? They'll have their faces on t-shirts next, I'll bet.
-- Cheers, Bob > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of DagT > Sent: 28 July 2006 21:34 > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: Talk about crap > > Not really, I should know. I am a patent attorney and former patent > examiner/clerk in Norway, and a partner here: http:// > www.protector.biz/uk/ You´ll find my face somewhere on that cite. > > ...and just to say somethng about the US patent attorneys: > They have > law degrees as well, making them very good at handling conflicts. > > DagT > > Den 28. jul. 2006 kl. 22.15 skrev Bob W: > > > Really? You amaze me. > > > > -- > > Cheers, > > Bob > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > >> Behalf Of DagT > >> Sent: 28 July 2006 20:51 > >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >> Subject: Re: Talk about crap > >> > >> Well, actually the Swiss, and the German, are quite good. Fond or > >> rules and order. In Germany they often have Ph. D´s while > in the US > > > >> they often have bachelors degrees in their technical field... .-) > >> > >> DagT > >> > >> Den 28. jul. 2006 kl. 21.29 skrev Bob W: > >> > >>> Perhaps he drew it with brakes and intends to put a big sign on > > them > >>> when he's built it saying "Warning - do not apply brakes. Applying > >>> brakes invalidates warranty". > >>> > >>> That would easily get by the patent clerks, who are > >> probably not very > >>> good at physics anyway. Especially the Swiss. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Cheers, > >>> Bob > >>> > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > >>>> Behalf Of graywolf > >>>> Sent: 28 July 2006 16:24 > >>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >>>> Subject: Re: Talk about crap > >>>> > >>>> Interesting, since the US patent laws specifically says PM > >>>> machines are > >>>> not patentable, and any such are automatically rejected without > >>>> consideration. Now it is possible some things have been patented > >>> that > >>>> fall into that category, but the fact that they do has, in that > >>> case, > >>>> been cleverly concealed by the applicant. > >>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >> [email protected] > >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > DagT > http://dag.foto.no > > Beware of internet links. You never know what is on the other side. > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
