Your're right, Bruce. My post tried to make an excuse for my not taking down some blossom highlights. The title may not help, but it's my way of expressing my feeling about the shot. :)
Thanks, Jack --- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A little work on the highlights would be good. The overall effect is > good and the picture is a nice one. I don't think the title helps - > I > really don't associate the lower strands to the flowers, especially > as > legs. Nice shot, just call it Water Lilies. > > -- > Best regards, > Bruce > > > Wednesday, August 2, 2006, 6:59:39 AM, you wrote: > > JD> Am curious as to your reaction to this. Does it need the title to > JD> 'explain' why I cropped it this way? Does it make sense, even > with the > JD> title? > JD> I realize that the lilies are a little blown out, but I'll leave > it at > JD> that for now. (got it all ready to load. :) > > JD> Thanks for opinions. > > JD> Jack > > JD> http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=154 > > JD> __________________________________________________ > JD> Do You Yahoo!? > JD> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > JD> http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
