Refers to our disagreement RE his review of the MZ-S.
In a review of the Monolta Dynax 5, he says:
"In a recent test I commented that a particular camera was
underspecified. The replies of some readers went along the lines of,
'Of course it is, as the manufacturer was trying to make the camera
small, light and portable'. Well here is a camera that is smaller and
lighter than others in its class, but still manages to knock out three
focused frames in a second of a moving subject. That is quite some
achievement."
He had to have the last word didnt he?
He is obviously still rather upset that we didnt agree with him, and
still misses the point regarding build quality which was second only to
the sloping top plate in Pentax design goals for the MZ-S.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
