Actually, expectations for those features I mentioned come from the interview with a Pentax high-up at one of the (Japanese?) trade shows. Obviously it's still rumour until we see the official press release, but it's based on a lot more than just wild internet speculation.
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 05:55:00PM -0400, Aaron Reynolds wrote: > "things we were led to expect" -- heh, make sure to direct your unhappiness > at the folks on the internet fuelling the rumormill and not at Pentax, who > have gone out of their way not to tell us anything. > > -Aaron > > -----Original Message----- > > From: John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subj: Re: K10D - More News > Date: Fri Aug 4, 2006 5:50 pm > Size: 648 bytes > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > > On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 05:13:27PM -0400, Mark Roberts wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > >Body + 18-55 lens should be $899. > > > > :( > > I was hoping for a higher-spec'd camera (around 1200-1500 body only). > > Hope they haven't cheaped out. > > Me too. Obviously the less the camera costs the more money is left > over for other things like lenses, but I hope that didn't come at the > expense of the other features we were led to expect - much faster AF, > and a large buffer (and a good frame rate). > > Still, we'll know for sure in a little over a month. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
