It was sold as the new top of the line, and in most respects had, at 
least for Pentax top of the line specifications.  The MZ-S was the 
Flagship but was soon discontinued anyway.  The *ist effectively 
replaced the MZ-S the MZ3/ZX5n MZ-6/ZX-L etc.  Don't forget the green 
button Kludge on the *ist-D didn't come along until there was a wave of 
protest from Pentax's  user base in Japan, (and here, but Japanese users 
are what Pentax probably really cared about).  I have no doubt that 
Pentax will change sensors as soon as it makes economic sense to do so.  
If a 1.3 crop or  full frame 35mm sensor is released next week with a 
price/quality ratio that makes economic sense.  Don't doubt that those 
DA lenses will be suddenly obsolete.

Paul Stenquist wrote:

>  The film *ist was a limited offering aimed at newbie amateurs. It  
>was built for use with consumer zooms. It wasn't likely that many  
>would want to use it with pre-A lenses.
>Paul
>On Aug 7, 2006, at 6:45 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
>
>  
>
>>They've never screwed with their customers like that before.  Well not
>>until the introduction of the *ist Film and Digital introduction that
>>is.  Try to meter with a pre-A lens on the film *ist and let me  
>>know how
>>that works for ya.
>>
>>Aaron Reynolds wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>On Aug 5, 2006, at 7:35 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>And encourage us to buy new lenses? Gosh, no!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>I just can't see it.  They've never screwed with the customer like  
>>>that
>>>before.
>>>
>>>Plus, their pro commitment is still to medium format.
>>>
>>>-Aaron
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>-- 
>>When you're worried or in doubt,
>>      Run in circles, (scream and shout).
>>
>>
>>-- 
>>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>[email protected]
>>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>    
>>
>
>
>  
>


-- 
When you're worried or in doubt, 
        Run in circles, (scream and shout).


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to