On Aug 9, 2006, at 9:31 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:

>>> Software-based anti-shake that works on photos you've already taken:
>>> http://news.com.com/Researchers+take+the+blur+out+of+shaky+photos/ 
>>> 2100-1041_3-6102910.html?tag=nefd.lede
>>>
>> This is really awesome!
>> I look forward to a mature product!
>
> Although most "miracle" image processing software eventually turns out
> to be BS, I think this one might be useful, although I'd like to try
> it myself on print-resolution images.

Part of my work on imaging correlators for Synthetic Aperture Radar  
remote sensors included development of motion compensating algorithms  
that lead in this direction. That was 20 years ago, and neither  
computing power nor the mathematical theory were well developed  
enough to obtain these results as yet for images without a priori  
data on sensor position. It's encouraging to see this stuff! Another  
generation or two of development, combine it with the plenoptic  
camera concepts (summary: record position, intensity and directional  
information of incoming light bundles hitting the sensor... current  
cameras record only position and intensity information) and imaging  
qualities will jump a quantum leap upwards.

> But imagine this technology *combined* with SR or IS!
> Perhaps we'll be hand-holding 300mm lenses at 1/15 ;-)

um ...

http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW4/large/33.jpg
© 2004 by Godfrey DiGiorgi
Canon 10D + 300mm f/4L IS
ISO 800 @ f/4 @ 1/10 sec

:-)

Godfrey
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to