FWIW,

I've never had a real problem scanning negatives with my K-M Dimage Scan 
Dual IV.

Velvia, yes, but never negs.

Tom C.

"I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or 
numbered."




>From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: Neg v Slide Scanning Results
>Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 13:29:04 -0700 (PDT)
>
>Let me jump in to add that 35mm neg scans on my Epson Perfection 3170
>PHOTO flatbed are doubtless crappier than yours.
>
>Jack
>
>--- Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I just wanted to add to this "on a scanner with poor dynamic range."
> >
> > Like I said before, my neg results are superior for ISO 400 and above
> > using a Polaroid Sprintscan 120.  Neg results are total crap from my
> > Epson 3200 flatbed.
> >
> > If you have a good scanner and standardize your process, i.e. get
> > your film processed at the same lab, preferably a consistent one, and
> > use the same film or group of films (the Fuji N series are nice and
> > consistent) the majority of your work only needs to be done once.
> >
> > -Aaron
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> >
> > From:  "Mat Maessen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subj:  Re: Neg v Slide Scanning Results
> > Date:  Tue Aug 8, 2006 7:55 pm
> > Size:  1K
> > To:  "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
> >
> > So to get the full dynamic range out of the
> > image, the scanner is working in a relatively small range of light
> > levels coming through the film. That's why it looks grainer.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > [email protected]
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>--
>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>[email protected]
>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to