They just did what was necessary. What more could they do? I saw no reason to fault them. Paul On Aug 11, 2006, at 12:29 AM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
> On 11/08/06, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> It's obvious, however, that Pentax had reason to kill the project. >> They didn't do it out of spite. > > But neither did they do it with the consideration, skill or dexterity > that anyone would expect from a large company. > > -- > Rob Studdert > HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > Tel +61-2-9554-4110 > UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ > Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
