Maybe if I say it's not something involving a moving sensor again people will believe me. ;)
-Aaron -----Original Message----- From: "Anthony Farr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subj: RE: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MP body Date: Tue Aug 15, 2006 8:03 am Size: 1K To: "'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'" <pdml@pdml.net> This remark makes me rethink those comments already posted about shifting the sensor to increase resolution or to gain a larger format. Does anybody remember the oscillating sensor? It was a technique used in scientific applications in the early days of digital capture, when sensors had too little resolution to be useful for quality work. If the antishake facility were used to oscillate the sensor around a one pixel diameter circuit, while making 6 captures as it crossed each "virtual photosite" (for want of a better description) then each photosite could, after the six captures were composited, display true RGB colour instead of interpolated RGB colour. Maybe. Regards, Anthony Farr > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aaron > Reynolds > Sent: Tuesday, 15 August 2006 11:36 AM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MP body > > > On Aug 14, 2006, at 8:12 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote: > > >> I hope Aaron is enjoying himself :o) > > > > I bet he is, this thread has been a monumental waste of EMF. I'm > > certainly not holding my breath in anticipation. > > Oh, now that's not very nice. > > I'm not yanking your chain! It really is something that would make me > reconsider the division between what work I do on medium format film > and what work I do on digital. It's that good. > > -Aaron > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
