> > > > Ahar, I knew I prodded the bottom of the pond, something > would stir ;-)) > > > > He, he... > > To be a bit more serious, though, I never did understand why > some people > made such a big deal of this option (or rather, Pentax not > having one) a > while back, but I think I agree with you that it is generally a Good
> Thing (with the downside of adding more complexity/new things > that may > go wrong...) And perhaps it is another of those things that are > "dangerous" for some people because they will trust the > technology too much? > > - T Bear in mind that your name is an anagram of ol' fart... -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
