http://v3.espacenet.com/textdoc?DB=EPODOC&IDX=JP2006032913&F=0
.-) DagT > Fra: "Anthony Farr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Aaron, > > Going back to the source might help me to dig out your meaning. > > "It addresses my most basic complaint about digital." > > We've explored noise reduction, but you seem to have gone "cold" on that > approach ;-) > > A few people have mentioned resolution but not followed it up (I believe > they mean resolving power a.k.a. sharpness). OK, I'll bite. > > We know that the killer of sharpness is the anti-moiré filter. When Nikon > released the D70 they only used a weak anti-moiré filter, for improved > sharpness at the risk of moiré when textiles etc. were shot. They > apparently got away with it and the D70 and its derivatives have been > praised for their sharper pictures. > > What if the anti-moiré filter were made retractable/removable, or dispensed > with altogether and moiré control implemented in software? Instead of > reducing the sharpness of every shot for the sake of the few that suffered > from moiré, you might get the best sharpness possible most of the time and > only bring in moiré control when needed. > > Regards, > Anthony Farr > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
