Nobody is in any doubt that it will be at least as good as the K100D, which is already a step up from the DL.
Most of the angst comes from *ist-D shooters like myself - people for whom all the later variants (DS, DL, DS2, DL2, K100D, K110D) have too many drawbacks to be considered as *ist-D replacements, even though the limitations of the D (small, slow buffer; tiny LCD screen, etc.) become more and more apparent as technology advances. I don't think you'll find many people here who think that using the extra MP simply as an excuse to pay less attention to composition while shooting is a good idea. While I'm not opposed to cropping, I think that having to crop half an image away means I'm using the wrong lens. On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 03:22:40PM +0300, Roman wrote: > What K10D will or will not be, time shows. If it's as good as *istDL, + > 11 AF points then its all good + 10Mp gives more space to crop more and > compose less during the shooting. > > http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20060814223110 > > -- > home <http://roman.blakout.net/> > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
