It's a lovely picture, Jack. I agree with the various criticisms, which are technical in nature, but the concept and composition and deep colours work well - for me, anyway - and transcend the slight technical imperfections.
Sounds obvious, but have you had your eyes tested recently? A tendency to over-sharpening could possibly be a response to your seeing blurrily. This might also explain why you don't see the over-sharpening yourself. John On Sat, 19 Aug 2006 05:45:20 +0100, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > William, > No flash. White reflector. > So, we now have sucking over sharpening? > Otherwise, how do you like it? :-]] > Thanks for thoughts. > > Jack > > > > --- William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Jack Davis" >> Subject: Re: PESO Dawn Jewlery >> >> >> > Paul, >> > Are you really serious about it's possibly being "over sharpened" >> or >> > is >> > this a spin off play on the recent Columbine exchanges? >> > You say "perhaps", does that mean you feel it is or you haven't >> > decided? >> > If you feel it is over sharpened, PLEASE clue me as to what it is >> you >> > see that causes you to reach that conclusion. Could you be >> confusing >> > "contrast" with something else? >> > Do I have a unique monitor? >> >> >> My initial reaction was that it is oversharpened and too contrasty as >> >> well. >> If you used flash, you used too much of it. >> Also the background sucks, and appears to be suffering from >> oversharpening. >> >> William Robb >> >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
