Paul, The lack of benefits to be derived from larger images is certainly missed. It's a gross world. I'll try not to contribute to it by heavy handed use of the USM tool.
Jack --- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nice shot, well composed. It's difficult to say with such a small > image, but it doesn't appear to be grossly oversharpened, but it may > be > borderline. The edges of the petals against black look just a wee bit > > crusty. > Paul > > On Aug 19, 2006, at 1:36 AM, Jack Davis wrote: > > > This shot with A70~210 f/4 with extension ring (forget which one) > and > > on macro setting. Been a favorite lens! > > Last offering for tonight and last flower for..(?) > > > > Jack > > > > http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=174 > > Comments encouraged! > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
