On Sat, 19 Aug 2006 22:53:47 +0100, Douglas Newman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > --- Pål Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> It is significantly smaller than the D200 and will >> give better image quality. > > Smaller is OK, so long as it is not BIGGER :-). I think you can be pretty certain that if it is smaller it won't be bigger. John > I have heard it will be a metal body with > weather-sealing; if so I guess that would put it > roughly on par with the D200 build-wise. > > Of course, better image quality is ALWAYS welcome. At > low ISOs the D200 looks OK but it is very noisy at > high ISOs. However, it still looks better than the > Sony A100 whose image quality is rather disappointing. > > New Doug > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
