Aaron, I never said the newer bodies were slower. Frankly I'm amazed how you appear to to understand the exact opposite of what I intended to convey, especially when my response to your post was only one word "Reeeeally?". Which only conveyed incredulity devoid of content. Are you sure that you're not my wife writing under a pseudonym. :-)))
You wrote "The *ist D isn't worth comparing, speed-wise, as even Pentax's cheapest DSLR outperforms it by a large margin now." My question is really "What large margin?" I've never compared them, but large margin? How large? Tom C. "I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered." From: Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> Subject: Re: CF v SD Cards Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:19:31 -0400 On Aug 22, 2006, at 11:58 AM, Tom C wrote: > Reeeeally? Okay, Tom, I'll bite: what Pentax body using SD cards is slower to write to the card than the original *istD using CF cards? I freely admit to having used only the D, the DS, the DS2 and the DL and to only owning the DS2. Are the new K bodies suddenly really slow? -Aaron -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
