Many a company has gotten a teetery division into temporary shape just so they could profitably send it to the asset strippers. Not saying that is what Pentax is doing, but don't be too surprised whatever happens.
-- graywolf http://www.graywolfphoto.com http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf "Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof" ----------------------------------- John Forbes wrote: > Aaron, > > It's nice to see Pentax doing beter, and especially nice that those > results come from the camera side. However, even the camera results are > far below "best ever", especially if you take inflation into account. > > What's really good is that the camera side is now the best performing > division, and it would be madness for Pentax to take the advice of that > crumby asset-stripper, Abe, and get out of the camera business. > > John > > > > > On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 06:10:40 +0100, Aaron Reynolds > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Aug 23, 2006, at 12:57 AM, David Savage wrote: >> >>> "2. An outline of financial and business results for the first quarter >>> of >>> 2006 business year >>> (from April 1, 2006 to June 30, 2006):" >> Hrm -- I'll have to place an inquiry as to where the numbers I was fed >> come from. >> >> -Aaron >> > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
