And we never will ... On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 12:53:43PM -0600, Tom C wrote: > > You never know! ;-) > > > Tom C. > > > > >So you're saying if you both shut up, then the list will be naturally > >balanced? > > > >-- > >Bruce > > > > > >Wednesday, August 23, 2006, 10:54:52 AM, you wrote: > > > >TC> Funny... I attack Pentax to maintain list equilibrium. :-) > > > > > > > >TC> Tom C. > > > > >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > > >>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > > >>Subject: Re: venting about lack of available 3rd party & other lense > > >>Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 17:52:09 +0000 > > >> > > >>Same guy. I'll debate you when I think you're attacking Pentax unfairly. > > >>But that's just to help maintain list equilibrium. If I'm a fan of any > > >>camera, I guess it would be Leica thread mounts, but I'm a user for the > > >>most part. I've owned and used two Nikons, five Mamiyas, two Leicas, one > > >>Speed Graphic, one Minolta, one Canon and two Fujis in addition to ten > >or > > >>so Pentax. I blame list enablement for the large number of Pentax > >tools:-). > > >>Paul > > >> -------------- Original message ---------------------- > > >>From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> > Are you the same Paul or have you been body-snatched by alien space > > >>pods? > > >> > :-) > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > Tom C. > > >> > > > >> > "I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or > > >> > numbered." > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > > >> > >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > > >> > >Subject: Re: venting about lack of available 3rd party & other lense > > >> > >Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 17:09:42 +0000 > > >> > > > > >> > >Cameras are only tools. I'm not a fan or an advocate of any brand. > >I've > > >> > >used most of them at one time or another. > > >> > >Paul > > >> > > -------------- Original message ---------------------- > > >> > >From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> > > > That borders on heresy coming from you, Paul. :-) > > >> > > > > > >> > > > I've actually heard lots of good things about the D200. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Tom C. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > "I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, > >debriefed > > >>or > > >> > > > numbered." > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> > > > >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > > >> > > > >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > > >> > > > >Subject: Re: venting about lack of available 3rd party & other > > >>lense > > >> > > > >Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 21:48:32 -0400 > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > >The Pentax K10, which is due next month, looks to be very > >similar > > >>to > > >> > > > >the Nikon D200. Perhaps better if Aaron's secret feature amounts > >to > > >> > > > >something. In any case, If I were to jump, it certainly wouldn't > >be > > >> > > > >to Nikon. The only viable alternative I see is Canon. > > >> > > > >Paul > > >> > > > >On Aug 22, 2006, at 9:43 PM, Amita Guha wrote: > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > On 8/21/06, Rick Womer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > > > > >> Amita, > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> Jump when in-body shake reduction is becoming > > >> > > > > >> available in a weather-sealed body? For Canon's > > >> > > > > >> overpriced and underperforming glass, or third-party > > >> > > > > >> glass? > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> You've gotta be kidding. > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> Rick > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > No, I'm not kidding. The specs on the K100 series don't > >impress > > >>me, > > >> > > > > > nor do the latest batch of Pentax lenses. I'm going to keep > >my > > >>best > > >> > > > > > Pentax lenses and the *istD, so If Pentax decides to someday > >put > > >>out > > >> > >a > > >> > > > > > body that is worth my money, I will snap it up in a > >heartbeat. > > >>The > > >> > >3rd > > >> > > > > > party glass thing is just a symptom of a larger problem. > >Bottom > > >>line > > >> > > > > > is that I'm sick of waiting for Pentax to put out products > >that > > >>I > > >> > > > > > actually want. I still love my existing glass, but I think > >three > > >> > >years > > >> > > > > > is long enough to wait for a new body. > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > In the meantime, I have my eye on the Nikon D200. I'm going > >to > > >>go > > >> > >look > > >> > > > > > at one this weekend. I'm not certain I'm going to go to > >Nikon, > > >> > >because > > >> > > > > > I want to wait for the camera shows, but I'm hoping to start > >a > > >>new > > >> > > > > > system by the end of the year. I spent last weekend > >researching > > >> > >lenses > > >> > > > > > for both Canon and Nikon and I'm satisfied that I can get > >what I > > >> > >need > > >> > > > > > for either system, although I will certainly miss my Ltd > >glass. > > >>:) > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Cotty, Nate thinks that the 20D would be almost a step > >sideways > > >>from > > >> > > > > > the *istD, although if I decide to go with Canon, I'll > >probably > > >> > >start > > >> > > > > > with the 20D and go from there. > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Amita > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > -- > > >> > > > > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > >> > > > > > [email protected] > > >> > > > > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > >-- > > >> > > > >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > >> > > > >[email protected] > > >> > > > >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > -- > > >> > > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > >> > > > [email protected] > > >> > > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > >-- > > >> > >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > >> > >[email protected] > > >> > >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > -- > > >> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > >> > [email protected] > > >> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>-- > > >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > >>[email protected] > > >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > > > > > > > > >-- > >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >[email protected] > >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
