What about 16-45 vs cheap 18-55? Is the upgrade even worth it? 2006/8/24, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I used it every day for almost a month. It's OK, but, IMO, over rated, > especially when used for detail work. Not at all bad for portraits, some > landscapes, travel ... but not up to critical standards or for fine > details. What other way is there to evaluate a lens than by using it, > i.e., an in use test? I used it hand held and on a tripod, I used it wide > open and stopped down, I used it for close focusing and for distant objects. > > Shel > > > > > [Original Message] > > From: Paul Stenquist > > > I tend to think you might be pleased with the 16-45 as well in a > > longer term test. In use evaluation is invaluable but not always > > accurate. > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >
-- ---------------------- Thibault Massart aka Thibouille ---------------------- *ist-D,Z1,SFXn,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ... -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
