On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 21:17:41 +0100, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you ask me they should have just waited around and stuck an APS-C > sensor > in it and called it good. They would still have produced a 6MP DSLR, > sure > maybe a year late. Changing specs on a product before bringing it to > market > would not have had the same stigma as never producing it.
For how many more years are you going to keep coming back to this? Is there no subject under the sun of more interest? John > Tom C. > > "I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or > numbered." > > > > > > > >> From: Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: Turbulent age >> Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:02:31 -0400 >> >> >> On Aug 24, 2006, at 3:12 PM, Cotty wrote: >> >> > <http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/bodies/prototypes/MZ-D.html> >> > >> > >> > C'est la vie, uh? >> >> Yeah, but did you ever see the pictures it took? It took balls, but >> killing that thing off was probably the smartest move they made in a >> decade. >> >> -Aaron >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
