Damn. Responded to the wrong message. But good night to you as well, Jack. Paul On Aug 24, 2006, at 11:35 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Three dogs! For some reason I wasn't looking at them. Must have been > distracted by something else:-). > I've benefited more from luck than talent, but thanks for the > encouraging words. > Good night pal. > Paul > On Aug 24, 2006, at 11:22 PM, Jack Davis wrote: > >> I'm like a fretting "parent" hoping for a Pentax win. Their relative >> position is lagging, but they're moving up. >> >> Jack >> >> --- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> For the first time since I've been using Pentax on a regular basis, >>> there is a light at the end of the tunnel. They're doing better >>> today >>> >>> than they've done at any time since perhaps the 1970s. The wringing >>> of hands surprises me. >>> Paul >>> On Aug 24, 2006, at 5:03 PM, Jack Davis wrote: >>> >>>> I find it difficult to watch the competition usurp Pentax in >>>> satisfying >>>> market after market while they seem to be suffering from product >>>> constipation. >>>> If I didn't care about they're success, I wouldn't give a damn >>> either. >>>> >>>> Jack >>>> >>>> --- Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Aug 24, 2006, at 11:59 AM, Tom C wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> On Aug 24, 2006, at 10:53 AM, Tom C wrote: >>>>>>>> That's not true at all. How can you make a judgement like >>> that? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> By interpreting what I read on this list. It's my opinion: I can >>>>> form >>>>>>> whatever opinion I want from the evidence in front of me. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> So now you know your formed opinion may be wrong. :-) >>>>>> >>>>>> And by your logic, what's wrong with other's evaluating the >>>>>> evidence and >>>>>> stating their opinion? >>>>>> >>>>>>> You may disagree with that opinion, but it doesn't change the >>> fact >>>>>>> that this is how it sounds to me from reading all these bs >>>>> postings >>>>>>> and rants. >>>>> >>>>> As I said, directly above. An opinion is an opinion. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> If you "can't afford to run out and buy a new camera system >>>>> everyday" >>>>>>> what does it matter that Pentax "should have been concentrating >>> on >>>>>>> getting more innovative products to market sooner"? >>>>>> >>>>>> Because if they had a higher spec'd body it wouldn't be a whole >>> new >>>>> >>>>>> system, >>>>>> and maybe I can afford that. Yes I realize you don't consider >>>>>> camera gear >>>>>> an investment, but some of us may buy 5 DLSR's, some 2, some only >>>>>> 1. So >>>>>> making the choice that's right for us individually is important. >>>>> >>>>> And evidently you feel that what you bought was not the right >>> choice? >>>>> >>>>> or perhaps I'm reading too much into your negativity. >>>>> >>>>>> As Jack Davis adeptly realized and pointed out, I'm not bashing >>> the >>>>> >>>>>> physical >>>>>> Pentax product. I'm commenting on Pentax's strategy and >>>>>> marketing. I'm >>>>>> wondering how their decisions of the past and present will affect >>>>>> their >>>>>> future. >>>>> >>>>> As I've said, I like their developmental strategy. >>>>> >>>>> I have no opinion about their marketing. Neither do I care about >>> any >>>>> >>>>> other camera manufacturers' marketing. That's their business. I >>> hope >>>>> >>>>> Pentax is successful and stay in business as I do like their >>>>> products, but they're success has nothing whatever to do with >>> whether >>>>> >>>>> their equipment does the job I want when I buy it. >>>>> >>>>> G >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> __________________________________________________ >>>> Do You Yahoo!? >>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >>>> http://mail.yahoo.com >>>> >>>> -- >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> >> >> >> __________________________________________________ >> Do You Yahoo!? >> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >> http://mail.yahoo.com >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
