I don't think you have to worry about the K10D being better, it's very likely going to be. As nice as the *istD is, it's not particularly good at high ISO's. The D is noisy for a 6MP camera.
-Adam Paul Stenquist wrote: > Yes, good point. One reason I'm going to keep one of my *istD cameras > after the release of the 10D is due to its excellent high ISO > capability. Of course, if the 10 is better, it might join its sibling > on the block. > Paul > On Aug 27, 2006, at 9:11 PM, Douglas Newman wrote: > > >>I did enjoy Mike's review, but I am surprised to hear >>that he finds something deficient about the high ISO >>capability of the K100D. It should be just as good as >>any other camera - or at least its *ist-series >>predecessors were. >> >>I am going to send him an e-mail and ask him to >>elaborate on this point. >> >>New Doug >> >>__________________________________________________ >>Do You Yahoo!? >>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >>http://mail.yahoo.com >> >>-- >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>[email protected] >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
