I find that hard to imagine... and misguided... and I still haven't heard a clamor.
I don't know why anybody that has the mindset to shoot RAW format and spend the time post-processing would also not want the max resolution they could get. If file size is an overarching concern, trumping quality, then there's other 6MP models they can buy. Tom C. >From: John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: Full Frame/Canon >Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 16:44:02 -0400 > >On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 10:39:47AM -0600, Tom C wrote: > > Well 'they' are not lying when they claim to have two more MP. That's >not > > marketing hype. It is true. So far I have read nothing in the reviews >of > > Canon's 8MP camera bodies that suggest they perform poorly when held up > > against Pentax's 6MP bodies. > > > > Are you just editorializing? If Pentax had an 8MP and Canon only 6MP, >would > > the same skew be applied? :-) > > > > Honestly asking, because so far I haven't heard a single person anywhere > > clamor for a camera with fewer MP. > > > >I guess you've missed all the people who want a 6MP K10D (or K1D), >and not a 10MP one. > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >[email protected] >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
