Yes, it was hand held. I agree. It's a surprisingly good lens. It's even better at 250 or so. (This shot was wide open at 320.) P On Sep 2, 2006, at 8:00 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
> Well, it's a bit more than 'adequate, in my opinion. It could be > a bit sharper but the composition makes up for that. Was it hand > held? > > I quite like the 80-320. I wasn't expecting great things when I > bought it but I've been very pleasantly surprised by its performance. > > > Cheers > > Brian > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Brian Walters > Western Sydney Australia > Quoting Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> At the Detroit Zoo, with the FA 80-320/4.5-5.6. I rarely use this >> >> lens, but it's nice when you want something rather long yet easy to >> >> carry around. Here it's wide open at 320mm, ISO 400. Not great, but >> >> adequate. >> >> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4885126&size=lg >> Paul >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > ---- > Get a spam free email account - Visit http://www.bluebottle.com > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
