You did it very well. There may be a few small problems as some have pointed out, but the reality is that most of the defects are a matter of perception.
Shel Belinkoff wrote: >I had to try one Peter ... just to know I could do it. Hard to say how >successful it is as I don't care much for such photos. A few months ago I >asked for people to send me samples of their flower pics, just to get some >ideas for this little experiment. Looking at lighting, framing, subject, >etc., it seemed that this might fit the genre to some degree. I wasn't >looking to break new ground, just to do something that fit what seemed to >be a generally accepted style and to see if I could do it. > >Shel > > > > > >>[Original Message] >>From: P. J. Alling >> >> > > > >>This is lovely, and so un-Shel like. Who are you and what >>have you done with Sbel? >> >>Shel Belinkoff wrote: >> >> >> >>>http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/rose.html >>> >>> > > > > > -- Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no simpler. --Albert Einstein -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
