I don't see an issue with the way it is. The structure isn't significant enough to stand by itself without the layers of fields.
Kenneth Waller ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joseph Tainter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Photography (for a change) > This is a question about composition. I came across the following photo > (not mine): > > http://www.zyeuter.com/bon_baiser_de_valensole/photo107872.html > > There is much about it that I like, but I think that the bottom third is > a mistake. It seems to me that the photographer should have cut off the > bottom third, then extended the composition somewhat to the right (if > possible--maybe there's a cement plant there), placing the building at > the upper-left "golden rectangle" point. > > What do others think? Is there justification for keeping the lower third? > > Joe > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
