The trees were between 5 and 75 feet tall.  The island was between 5 and 10 
feet long.  Wait let me go get a yardstick. ;-)

You just don't have an inquiring mind. :-)


Tom C.








>From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: PESO - One Man Island
>Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 14:49:23 -0700 (PDT)
>
>I agree that a scene's scale need not be revealed. As doing so effects
>the message of the image, that decision must be left to the photo
>person.
>Many scenes, of course, do carry a greater "WOW" factor if their scale
>is known. In others, not knowing may increase the intregue of the
>image.
>In this case, it hadn't occurred to me to wonder.
>
>Jack
>
>--- keith_w <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Tom C wrote:
> > > Thanks Keith... I have mixed emotions regarding the comment that
> > the shot
> > > needs to have scale.   It was my intent to isolate the subject from
> > it's
> > > surroundings, and have it loom large in the frame, which I did in
> > this shot.
> > >
> > > I haven't had a chance to look at it the context of the others, but
> > I'll do
> > > so to see if I can make myself feel the same way. :-)
> > >
> > > Maybe the fact that it made you ask the question, "What else is
> > there?"
> > > makes it a successful shot.   Typically I'm intrigued by shots that
> > I not
> > > only enjoy, but leave me wanting to see more. :-)
> > >
> > > Just my take.
> > >
> > > Thanks again for commenting.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Tom C.
> >
> > That it remains scale-less is perfectly okay.
> > It's a great shot all by itself, so if you leave it hanging, so to
> > speak, the
> > problem is the viewers!
> >
> > What you see is what you GET! ;-)
> >
> > keith
> >
> > >> From: keith_w <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
> > >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
> > >> Subject: Re: PESO - One Man Island
> > >> Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 02:01:37 -0700
> > >>
> > >> Tom C wrote:
> > >>> Hey,
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks Ken, Ken, Bruce & Jack.
> > >>>
> > >>> Bruce, the island was about 50 yards from sure by my estimation.
> > Trees
> > >> were
> > >>> quite tall.  I'll ty and post a more normal perspective if I have
> > one.
> > >> Hi Tom.
> > >>
> > >> I loved the image, but...it needed something recognizable to give
> > it scale.
> > >> The only feeling I got from is was How big is that rock, How tall
> > are those
> > >> trees, Is it a short distance across the water, or a large one?
> > >>
> > >> You say Normal Perspective, but even that is lost without a
> > "scale"
> > >> reference.
> > >>
> > >> Of course, you can't go back and ADD anything, but the only
> > improvement I
> > >> could suggest is that!
> > >>
> > >> Nicely viewed and it's a good shot!
> > >>
> > >> keith whaley
> >
> >
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > [email protected]
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>--
>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>[email protected]
>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to