On Sep 7, 2006, at 9:01 AM, Mat Maessen wrote:

>> I like the ibook, and the mac way of things, for the most part, but i
>> do like 1-2 PC programs i still run, but i'm sure i can get mac based
>> ones aswell.(Apperently BBPro will not be available anytime soon for
>> Mac)
>
> Look into a product called Parallels. It will let you run a Windows XP
> "virtual machine" on an Intel-based Mac. Also, there's a product
> called Boot Camp, which will let you multi-boot the intel-based macs
> into either Windows XP or OSX.
>
> Yes, a mac that runs windows. No, I'm not kidding.

I have several clients running Boot Camp on their Apple Intel-based  
systems. The new systems run Windows very well, although there are a  
few issues with some oddball driver or another that doesn't work.  
Parallels has more driver limitations and does not provide anywhere  
near the same performance at this point in time, but allows both OS  
to be running simultaneously.

The next version of Mac OS X will have what is now "Boot Camp"  
embedded and will be able to run both OSes without having to add  
anything at all.

I do contracting work on Apple systems and Mac OS X system  
administration. Not one person who has purchased an Apple Intel-based  
system - Mini, iMac, MacBook Pro, MacBook, or Mac Pro - has  
complained that they bought the wrong system to date, whether they  
came from Mac OS X or Windows background. There have certainly been  
some glitches but all have been resolvable to their satisfaction with  
very little effort.

When Photoshop is upgraded to a Universal Binary, or Lightroom goes  
final, there will be powerful incentive for me to upgrade the G5 to a  
Mac Pro tower... ! I'll continue to run Mac OS X though as Windows  
gives me a headache. ;-)

Godfrey

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to