>he COULD be wrong because his understanding is based on currently >available knowledge and technology. Change is constant. I cited an >example of someone drawing firm conclusions about future advances based >only on the technology as it was understood at the time.
Possible sensor, not practical, at least not for a while. Take a MUCH improved Fovion type sensor so each pixel sensor gets all protons, not just R or G or B. Stick all the electronics on the back so the sensor wells occupy close to 100% of the surface of the chip. Improve the electronics to the point where you can count each photon with practically no noise. Highly improbable, but not impossible. Should give some increase in sensitivity and latitude. Powell -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
