On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 20:01:10 +0200, IVAN SHUKSTER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> also own two SF1n and one MZ5n. When looking at some retail second hand > prices I noticed that there was only about $20 difference between the > SF1n and the MZ5n. As the latter is at least one generation newer and > has faster AF does the small price difference relflect that these stores > have a minimum price and the MX5n is just above it? Am I missing > something on the differences between the two cameras? Am not intending > on selling the MZ5n, at least not yet so just curious. I am aware that I > should not expect to receive the same price that a retailer would get . I think the store is overasking for the SF-1n. The MZ-5n is at least two generations newer, and one of the all-time favourite Pentaxes. The SF-1n was top-of-the-line in its day, but those days are long gone... For more realistic pricing, check the completed auctions at ebay. Do this for a while, as prices can vary from month to month. Currenty, I find $20 and $60 for the SF-1n (both body only), $80 though $250 for MZ-5n's (all with lens). This seems normal, with some very high prices for MZ-5n's... -- Regards, Lucas -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
