indeed.I have a CF -> IDE adapter which is passive. 2006/9/12, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Sep 11, 2006, at 9:58 PM, John Francis wrote: > > >>>> Doesn't CF use a modified IDE interface? That might be a large > >>>> part of why its still around. > >>>> > >>> > >>> I'm not sure about CF using or being a modified IDE. > >> It is. In fact, there are even passive adapters for CF->IDE > >> (being the > >> 40-pin sort found in desktop computers). > > > > Yep. I've even heard of people booting systems directly > > off CF cards, using just an adapter cable. > > > > Interesting. Is it not also true that the CF to PC card adapters are > basically passive adaption? The PCMCIA specification is very adaptable. > > Godfrey > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >
-- Thibault Massart aka Thibouille ---------------------- *ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ... -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
