I would appreciate a full 3fps, but 2.5 from the D50 has done fine for me until now.
-Adam Jack Davis wrote: > The slower than advertised continuous shutter speed is not a deal > breaker for me either. Only a remote possibility it would ever be > "needed". > I feel a "rush" over owning this unit, but it'll be a few > weeks...probably. I just want to calm down a bit. ;) > Hope your plans go well. > > Jack > > --- Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Measured on their prototype at 2.4 fps vs the 3 fps claimed ... well, >> >>for me that's just not an issue at all. It's fast enough. I rarely >>shoot more than one frame at a time. >> >>I'll order a body as soon as is convenient and sensible. I have >>travel coming up, then I'm back for a month, then I'm traveling >>again. Would be nice to have it asap but no rush ... I rarely take >>anything on travel I haven't had a few weeks to work with and be >>familiar with all its foibles. >> >>Godfrey >> >> >> >>On Sep 13, 2006, at 4:29 PM, Jack Davis wrote: >> >> >>>As mentioned in the preview, the continuous shutter speed rate >>>certainly does sound slower than the alleged 3 fps. Hope the fact >> >>that >> >>>it's a pre-production example is the explanation. >>>Noted a preview shutter speed typo.(?) 1/8000. >>>Anxious to see custom function listing. >>>Not sure I'll be able to wait for the dpreview "review" prior to >>>placing an order. I get the feeling that when it happens, it'll >>>probably be a "back order". >> >> >>-- >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>PDML@pdml.net >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
