You only got 4?? I got 6 with noise reduction off. rg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Much better than the D's 4 RAW's or 6 JPEG's. If the D had been 6 RAW > I'd likely still own it, the 2 shot difference is a big one for me (6 is > enough to keep me from hitting the slow-down, 4 is not). > > -Adam > > > Gonz wrote: > >>The new specs say 9 @ RAW. :( >> >>Not as good as 12, but better than the D's 6. >> >>rg >> >> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> >>>Wo-hoo! 12 RAW shots at 3 FPS. JPEG's at 3FPS: The card is the limit! >>>Tha'ts what I want! >>>Regards >>> >>>Jens Bladt >>>http://www.jensbladt.dk >>>+45 56 63 77 11 >>>+45 23 43 85 77 >>>Skype: jensbladt248 >>> >>>-----Oprindelig meddelelse----- >>>Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Shel >>>Belinkoff >>>Sendt: 12. september 2006 20:57 >>>Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>Emne: K10D Buffer Size/Speed >>> >>> >>>12 RAW @ 3fps ... might that indicate a bigger or faster buffer? If so, >>>then maybe the camera will take advantage of faster SD cards, like 120X or >>>greater. Might be worth checking out before buying cards. >>> >>>Shel >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>[Original Message] >>>>From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> >>> >>>>I'm a happy Pentaxian: >>>>Dual exposure wheels, ISO 100, Hyper Program mode, >>>>and up to 12 RAW at 3fps. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>-- >>>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>[email protected] >>>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>-- >>>No virus found in this incoming message. >>>Checked by AVG Free Edition. >>>Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.3/446 - Release Date: 09/12/2006 >>> >>>-- >>>No virus found in this outgoing message. >>>Checked by AVG Free Edition. >>>Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.3/446 - Release Date: 09/12/2006 >>> >>> >> >> > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
