CR-V3's last a bit longer, as they have more capacity due to the higher volume.
-Adam Tom C wrote: > Yep, Alkaline AA's were a last resort but they saved me a couple of times > when that's all I had or could get. > > My perception is that the Lithium CRV3's and Lithium AA's were roughly equal > in longevity. > > > > Tom C. > > > > > >>From: Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >>Subject: Re: Lack of AA Battery Power - they don't have a choice >>Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 14:12:29 -0400 >> >>Brendan MacRae wrote: >> >>>--- Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>I'm holding out hope that they come out with an >>>>adapter to put AA's in >>>>the battery grip. That would give us the best of >>>>both worlds :) >>> >>> >>>Not going to happen. As someone mentioned earlier, the >>>camera simply uses too much power for AA's. In the >>>K100D review this month's Pop Photo mentioned how the >>>camera provides 70 shots on alkaline AA's...terrible >>>performance. Certainly it does better with other bats >>>but the SR system and other things seem to really chew >>>up power in the new cameras so AA's are going the way >>>of the Dodo for sure. >>> >>>-Brendan >>> >> >>Brendan, >> >>70 shots off Alkaline AA's would be an improvement. 50 or less was >>typical of the D and DS. Lithium and NiMH's are far superior and give 10 >>times or more as much life as Alkaline. >> >>-Adam >> >> >>-- >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>[email protected] >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
